| News Features Views Editorial Letters to the Editor Columns Arts Art Attack! Lucie Blue Tremblay: Folk Concert Benefits Pride The Adjacent Sex Queerly Pursuing the Wiccan Path So Many Books, So Little Time Rocking and Writing Against Depression Navel Gazing Author Predicts the 'End of Gay' Choosing Fatherhood Fiction: Q Queer Classics: Collecting Our Forgotten Past Community Compass Comics | |   | Queer Classics: Collecting Our Forgotten Past | by Ernie McLeod Pulp Friction: Uncovering the Golden Age of Gay Male Pulps edited by Michael Bronski St. Martin's Griffin | Pulp fiction minus its current ironic connotations is, as editor Michael Bronski is quick to point out, an inexact term. Literally, the pulp refers to the paper that was used to make cheap paperbacks after World War II. Eventually, it came to define a certain sensationalistic style of writing and cover art marketed in a certain way. Bronski demonstrates that a broad range of writing could be found beneath the covers of what was marketed as pulp fiction. And the gay (male) pulps Bronski has chosen to excerpt in this anthology range in literary quality from high to idiosyncratically low. Bronskis introduction sets the stage for whats to come by dismantling myths about pulp and gay fiction: that gay fiction barely existed prior to the 1969 Stonewall uprising, that in the 1950s the subject of homosexuality was completely taboo, and that the few writings with gay content were relentlessly grim and unenlightened. While hopelessly depressing takes on gay life certainly exist, Bronski serves up writers who take a more complex view of gay male relationships and interactions. Before exploring Pulp Friction, I thought I was reasonably familiar with gay fiction from 1950-1978. Yet, not only had I not read any of the works featured in the anthology, Id never heard of most of the authors. Why not? Almost everything excerpted in Pulp Friction is long out of print. Pulps, by their very physical nature, were disposable. Additionally, gay pulps had a shame element working against their preservation: often they were clandestinely distributed, kept hidden and eventually destroyed, lest they out their owners. The other reason gay pulps are largely forgotten even by queer readers is that after Stonewall, many gay people wanted to break free of the past. Pre-Stonewall depictions of gay life were deemed unfashionably obsolete by a new, forward-looking generation that dismissed them as negative relics from a time best forgotten. The queer characters who did survive were created by writers (Gore Vidal, James Baldwin, Carson McCullers, Tennessee Williams, and Truman Capote among them) who managed to etch a permanent place in the mainstream canon. In making his selections for Pulp Friction, Bronski put aside notions of a canon gay or otherwise. He finds the whole concept not only unnecessary but unhelpful and quotes Edmund White: a canon is for people who dont like to read. Bronski believes and Im inclined to agree that too much is made of the idea of positive and negative portrayals, the question of whether a particular work of art (whatever its artistic merits) is good for the gays. Ive perhaps made Pulp Friction sound more dryly academic than it actually is. What I wanted was an amiable guide to escort me into the twilight world of the pulps themselves. Bronksi is that, and more. Bronski divides his selections into several general categories chronologically, with a few zigzags and then offers unobtrusive, illuminating introductions to each piece. He tells the reader what he knows about the authors (many of whom wrote under pseudonyms), the presses that published the books, and the historical climate in which the books were conceived and read. Bronski recognizes that the slipshod erotic musings contained in the Memoirs of Jeff X or The Boys of Muscle Beach are, from an artistic standpoint, miles away from the nuanced prose of Lonnie Colemans Sam or Vin Packers Whisper His Sin. Refraining from making obvious value judgments, hes more concerned with what each work has to say about the times and, especially, about the gay men who occupied them. That isnt to say he doesnt value good writing; he just refuses to devalue writing that cant legitimately be called literature. His critical insights into some of the quirkier selections were particularly useful. I wouldnt have known what to make of an excerpt from Richard Amorys Song of the Loon (along with its sequels, apparently the most widely read gay fiction of the 60s and 70s) without Bronskis neat summary of Amorys writing style as a heady cross between a lush poetic epic verging on parody, a boys adventure story, and Victorian porn. Ive left little space to discuss the selections themselves, but they are an eclectic lot, ranging from sympathetic character studies to a delightful Invasion of the Body Snatchers-style fantasy in which the whole world (even the President!) turns gay, to frank pornography. If Id read Bruce Bendersons Kyle when it was published in the mid-70s, it would have scared me to death. Some of the language throughout Pulp Friction is inevitably dated, silly, or simply head-scratching. But just as often its surprisingly inspired for works typically penned by writers who to earn a living couldnt fret over each semi-colon. Several selections stood out, among them: Spur Piece, a refreshingly reversed take on an unconsummated love relationship between an older and younger man set just after World War II; a psychologically smart and subversive chapter from Vin Packers Patricia Highsmith-esque Whisper His Sin (Vin Packer is a pen name for Marijane Meaker, who has a memoir about Highsmith coming out and was recently interviewed in The Advocate.); and a charmingly campy excerpt from Victor Jays The Gay Haunt, which breathlessly blends pansexual porn elements, witty social critique, and a queered Blithe Spirit ghost story. After reading Pulp Friction, I definitely want to seek out the writings of Marijane Meaker, James Barr, and Lonnie Coleman. Bronski includes a valuable appendix of important gay novels (some famous, many not) from 1940-1969. If I can find them, I plan to add several of the titles to my overcrowded reading list. Pulp Friction is the rare anthology thats arousing on various levels, equally appropriate for a quiet beach or cruisy library. It certainly has me looking at the 50s and my kitschy pulp-cover address book in a whole new light. Native Vermonter Ernie McLeod is spending time in his alternate pied a terre, but he can be reached via email at mcleod@middlebury.edu. |