| News
Acting
Locally
Sticks
and Stones May Break My Bones
Groups
Urge Gender Bill Testimony
Windham
County Seeks LGBT Activists
Burlington
Protects Trans Students
Guess
Who's Coming to the Mayor's Cup?
CR
Rates Condoms
Smoke
Gets in Your Eyes
The
Rest of Our World
Features
Views
Editorial
Letters
to the Editor
Columns
Arts
Community
Compass
Comics
|

Sticks
and Stones
May Break My Bones
Lesbian Baiting Around the World
by Susan McMillan
and Lynn MacNicol
Remember
the ageless schoolyard tease – sticks and stones may break my
bones, but names will never hurt me? Women all over the world would
argue against the truth of that statement. Globally, in developed
and developing countries, women are targeted for physical, verbal,
and emotional attack because of their work in public leadership and
human rights. This abuse often takes the form of accusations around
real or perceived sexual orientation, or "lesbian baiting."
The International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC)
and the Center for Women's Global Leadership recently released Written
Out: How Sexuality is Used to Attack Women’s Organizations (2005)
documenting this harsh reality.
In a world where religious, political, and social fundamentalism is
on the rise and the heavy pall of homophobia lingers, women and women's
rights organizations are increasingly at risk of attack for the work
they do that threatens these fundamentalist movements. Lesbian-baiting
is commonplace and even widespread, targeting women in public leadership.
According to the IGLHRC, there is "a seemingly universal dynamic
for most women who dare to assert their leadership and perspectives
as public advocates: the disparagement and silencing of their identities
and political visions through sexuality-based attacks."
According to Written Out (2005),
in "lesbian-baiting," an individual, police force, government
body, or the media will accuse women, openly or by innuendo, with
being "sexually licentious, dangerous, immoral, perverted, or
a threat to culture, tradition, the family, and moral codes in general."
The attacks discredit the women, impact their ability to advocate
for change, and stifle their freedom of expression. The goal is to
force the women to abandon their work and to be silent. When lesbian
baiting succeeds, women cease their efforts at change or abandon issues
of sexuality, and sexual and reproductive rights.
Written Out (2005) was
released at the Beijing +10 Review on International Women’s
Day, March 8, 2005.
The Beijing + 10 conference was
part of the larger UN annual commission on the status of women meeting.
About 3,000 nongovernmental organizations and 180 countries were represented.
IGLHRC Program Director Susanna Fried said that about 10 governments
talked about sexual orientation, and about 20 governments talked about
sexuality and reproductive rights. While this may sound miniscule,
Fried said it nonetheless represents "a huge step forward from
where we have been in the past."
It was not until 1975, at the
First World Conference on Women in Mexico City, that there was an
"ah-ha" realization on the international scene. It occurred
to the United Nations that what happens to women and their children
has a profound impact on the well-being of entire nations. And as
a result of this shift, as women have become more active, more powerful,
or just more desperate to improve their lives and to fight for freedom,
these same women are seen as a threat to those individuals and governments
who cannot tolerate change.
At each of these international
meetings, progress is noted. Huge gains have been made. More women
are literate. More women are visible at high political levels. And
each decade also reveals that women are still tremendously vulnerable.
Women are poorer than ever. In Africa, people who live in poverty,
the great majority of whom are women, rose by 82 million in the past
decade. Violence against women, particularly in areas of conflict
and war, is rampant. At least some of that violence takes the form
of lesbian-baiting when women are "too threatening," "too
out-spoken," or "too independent," and not conforming
to social expectations and tradition.
"Fundamentalist organization
has become stronger and more visible in the past 5 to 10 years,"
Fried said, but more visible "because we are more outspoken in
fighting for our rights," she added. "We can judge the strength
of our organizing by the backlash against it."
Written Out (2005) documents
baiting incidents from around the world. The attacks can be insidious
or explosive, state-sponsored or random. Documented incidents include:
legal action used to snuff out a Catholic organization fighting for
reproductive rights in Argentina; sexually harassing phone calls;
television coverage of women demonstrating with footage of police
assaulting the women edited out before broadcast in Thailand; use
of websites to encourage broad involvement of the right wing to force
the dismissal of Patricia Ireland from the YWCA for her "radical,
bisexual, cross-dressing, and pro-abortion agenda."
The report concludes with recommendations
for change. The authors place a lot of emphasis on members of the
media to ensure that only real issues are reported and that fabricated
and false claims are not given press or air time. They call on police
and government to actually protect those they are charged with protecting
and to not turn a blind eye to attacks on women. The report asks opponents
of change to "play fair" and to discuss political disagreements
on their merits. Finally, the authors ask allies to affirm the indivisibility
of rights and freedoms, and to stand united in support of all human
rights.
Fried also said in an interview
that we need to understand that any woman leader in the human rights
movement "puts herself at risk of sexuality baiting" that
is directly linked to attacks against the LGBT community. "We're
really talking about all human rights for all."
In what might be viewed
as a victory for women's rights organizing, last month the U.S. withdrew
its anti-sexual and reproductive rights amendment to the Beijing Platform
for Action. The U.S. had submitted a controversial amendment to the
Draft Declaration of the Beijing +10 proceedings. The suggested language
stated that the Beijing Platform and the work of the General Assembly
"do not create new international human rights and do not include
the right to abortion." In spite of U.S. pressure, not a single
member nation broke rank to support the amendment.
Susan McMillan is assistant editor of OITM and lives
in Colchester with her partner and a couple of four-footed companions.
|