Out In the Mountains Logo


News

VT U.S. Senate Hopefuls Meet the Gay Press

John Tracy and Matt Dunne Go Head to Head in Lt. Gov. Primary

Douglas Defends Transgender Rights Veto

Now Who's Turning Their Backs?

Remarks of Pres. Bush on the MPA

Gays & Lesbians Boast Political Victories

In Memoriam

The Rest of Our World

Features

Views

Editorial

Letters to the Editor

Arts

Comics

News Section Header
Remarks of President Bush on the Marriage Protection Amendment


corrected and annotated by Mark Agrast, Sam Berger and Brodie Butland

GWB: Good afternoon and welcome to the White House. It is a pleasure to be with so many fine community leaders, scholars, family organizations, religious leaders, Republicans, Democrats, independents. (...) You come from many backgrounds and faith traditions, yet united in this common belief: Marriage is the most fundamental institution of civilization and it should not be redefined by activist judges.

FACT: Marriage is not being redefined by “activist judges.” As a new Cato Institute report by Professor Dale Carpenter notes, “The ‘threat’ from courts is more imagined than real.” Only one state has adopted same-sex marriage as a result of a court decision; 45 states have barred same-sex marriage by various means. The question isn’t whether “activist judges” should redefine marriage, but whether the states should have the opportunity to settle this matter in their own fashion, without federal interference.

GWB: You are here because you strongly support a constitutional amendment that defines marriage as the union of a man and a woman. And I am proud to stand with you.

FACT: Clearly this is not a representative group. Recent polling shows that the country is closely divided over whether to support a constitutional amendment against same-sex marriage In fact, a June 4 ABC News poll found that only 42% of the public supports such an amendment.

GWB: This week, the Senate begins debate on the Marriage Protection Amendment. And I call on the Congress to pass this amendment, send it to the states for ratification, so we can take this issue out of the hands of overreaching judges and put it back where it belongs: in the hands of the American people.

FACT: A constitutional amendment would not put power back “in the hands of the American people;” it would all but permanently remove the issue from the democratic process by preventing states from allowing same-sex marriage if they choose to do so. As conservative scholar Bruce Fein states, “[The Federal Marriage Amendment] precludes legislative bodies from recognizing same-sex unions irrespective of majority sentiments.”

GWB: America is a free society which limits the role of government in the lives of our citizens. In this country, people are free to choose how they live their lives.

FACT: People should be free to choose how they live their lives, including choosing whom they wish to marry. As Vice President Dick Cheney said in opposing a federal constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage, “Freedom means freedom for everybody.”

GWB: In 1996, Congress approved the Defense of Marriage Act by large bipartisan majorities in both the House and the Senate, and President Clinton signed it into law.

FACT: That’s why the Marriage Protection Amendment is superfluous. Former representative Bob Barr, the author of the Defense of Marriage Act, strongly opposes the amendment as unnecessary and an affront to federalism.

GWB: This national question requires a national solution.

FACT: Marriage has never been a “national question.” It has always been governed by state law, and should remain so.

GWB: A constitutional amendment would not take this issue away from the states, as some have argued. It would take the issue away from the courts, and put it directly before the American people.

FACT: A constitutional amendment would override state decisions, whether they are made by courts, legislatures, or popular referenda, and it would be virtually impossible to reconsider.

GWB: As this debate goes forward, every American deserves to be treated with tolerance and respect and dignity.

FACT: No American is treated with respect and dignity by this amendment, which not only demeans gay and lesbian citizens but shows contempt for the ability of the people to rightly decide this issue for themselves through the democratic process.

GWB: All people deserve to have their voices heard, and a constitutional amendment will ensure that they are heard.

FACT: A constitutional amendment will silence the voices of millions of Americans today and those of generations to come.

Mark Agrast is a Senior Fellow, Sam Berger is a Research Assistant, and Brodie Butland is a Legal Intern, all at the Center for American Progress.

The above is an edited version. FMI contact Center for American progress at media@americanprogress.org



Copyright © Mountain Pride Media